<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some features that would really make Twitter better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gadodia.net/some-features-that-would-really-make-twitter-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gadodia.net/some-features-that-would-really-make-twitter-better/</link>
	<description>"... tech .... fun .. bizarre ... india .... pictures ..... anything in the world ...."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo</title>
		<link>http://blog.gadodia.net/some-features-that-would-really-make-twitter-better/comment-page-1/#comment-11544</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gadodia.net/some-features-that-would-really-make-twitter-better/#comment-11544</guid>
		<description>Right on.  That makes sense.  Let&#039;s lobby for Twitter to do it!  :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on.  That makes sense.  Let&#8217;s lobby for Twitter to do it!  <img src='http://blog.gadodia.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaibhav</title>
		<link>http://blog.gadodia.net/some-features-that-would-really-make-twitter-better/comment-page-1/#comment-11535</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaibhav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gadodia.net/some-features-that-would-really-make-twitter-better/#comment-11535</guid>
		<description>Gustavo, I actually meant rating users and not tweets themselves. I think the RT mechanism is perfect for telling your followers what is interesting and what is not.

But, when people rate users, then we can collectively clear out all spam/bot activity from public timelines, search, and trending topics (search again).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gustavo, I actually meant rating users and not tweets themselves. I think the RT mechanism is perfect for telling your followers what is interesting and what is not.</p>
<p>But, when people rate users, then we can collectively clear out all spam/bot activity from public timelines, search, and trending topics (search again).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo</title>
		<link>http://blog.gadodia.net/some-features-that-would-really-make-twitter-better/comment-page-1/#comment-11532</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gadodia.net/some-features-that-would-really-make-twitter-better/#comment-11532</guid>
		<description>I agree on the User Ratings 100%.  Having at least the means to say &quot;Thumbs Up,&quot; &quot;Thumbs Down&quot; would be very helpful in identifying things that others found interesting.  You don&#039;t directly mention whether you are for star ratings, but I would not be in favor of that (especially since Tweets are kind of like Youtube comments in brevity).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the User Ratings 100%.  Having at least the means to say &#8220;Thumbs Up,&#8221; &#8220;Thumbs Down&#8221; would be very helpful in identifying things that others found interesting.  You don&#8217;t directly mention whether you are for star ratings, but I would not be in favor of that (especially since Tweets are kind of like Youtube comments in brevity).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

